Layout Image

It’s a shame that in the sweets department, we continuously make the problem worse with what we believe is right and what the food manufacturers want us to believe.

Thus far, the herb, Stevia, is the best sugar substitute available. I agree, it does not do justice in all foods and is not perfect, but works to naturally sweeten many drinks.

Aspartimine-Nutri-sweet is by far the worst substance you can consume. It is an excito-toxin to the brain, and was forced through the FDA ruling by a very powerful politician. Google it, if you want to know more.

Splenda, the newest kid on the block of alternative sweeteners, has it’s share of problems too. Please read to following article and forward to your friends to educate yourself on the issues you need to know that influence your health. Remember that, a single packet of sugar in the raw, which is plain old sugar that has not been bleached, is only 13 calories. The key is consume as little as possible, but 1-2 packets a day is far from excess, and it beats continuously putting deleterious chemicals into your body day after day.

Dr. Marks

 

 

Splenda Essentials pretend to be health supporting, when in fact they seem to have more in common with pesticides than with sugar.

Sucralose, sold under the brand name Splenda, is simply chlorinated sugar; in chemical terms, it is a chlorocarbon. The idea behind this is that the body would no longer recognize it as sugar. But, as Johns Hopkins-trained physician and biochemist James Bowen, MD, points out, chlorine is “nature’s Doberman attack dog—a highly excitable, ferocious atomic element employed as a biocide in bleach, disinfectants, insecticide, WWI poison gas and hydrochloric acid.” Common chlorocarbons include chlordane and DDT, a product so harmful that it is now banned for agricultural use the world over.

Now Splenda is selling a product called Splenda Essentials. Different formulations contain B vitamins, antioxidants (vitamins C and E), or fiber. The marketing and advertising appear to be targeting health-conscious people who are interested in vitamins and nutrition—despite the fact that Splenda is highly toxic and has no place in a healthy diet.

Splenda’s advertising says the addition of B1, B5, and B6 “help support a healthy metabolism.” The antioxidant product “contains vitamin C and E, like those found in fruits and vegetables,” while the fiber product is touted as containing “one gram of healthy fiber.” For the vitamins, Splenda has added 20% of the recommended daily allowance; for the fiber, they’ve added 0.03% of the RDA. However, Splenda alters the microflora in the intestine and “exerts numerous adverse effects,” according to a DukeUniversitystudy, including an increase in body weight (not quite what a “diet aid” is supposed to do!) and an elevation of liver enzymes, which hurts the bioavailability of nutrients.

Dr. Bowen notes that the high solvency of chlorocarbons like Splenda attacks the human nervous system and can produce cancer, birth defects, and immune system destruction. In test animals, Splenda produced swollen livers (as do all chlorocarbon poisons), calcified their kidneys, shrunk their thymus glands (the biological seat of immunity) and produced liver inflammation.

The Alliance for Natural Health-Europe point out other adverse effects in animals as a result of sucralose ingestion: DNA damage in gastrointestinal organs, increase in the number of normal cells in the surface tissue of the kidney, hemorrhagic degeneration of the adrenal cortex (which regulates carbohydrate and fat metabolism, salt, and water balance), incidence of cataracts, marked gastrointestinal disturbance, and deaths in pregnant rabbits and aborted rabbit fetuses. Splenda’s adverse effects in humans include headaches and migraines and a long list of consumer-reported side effects including skin rashes/flushing, panic-like agitation, dizziness and numbness, diarrhea, swelling, muscle aches, intestinal cramping, bladder issues, and stomach pain.

Splenda has replaced aspartame as the number one artificial sweetener in foods and beverages; aspartame’s popularity declined after the public learned that that it is both a neurotoxin and an underlying cause of chronic illness. As Dr. Bowen warns, “We should not be fooled again into accepting the safety of a toxic chemical on the blessing of the FDA and saturation advertising. In terms of potential long-term human toxicity we should regard sucralose with its chemical cousin DDT, the insecticide now outlawed because of its horrendous long term toxicities at even minute trace levels in human, avian, and mammalian tissues.”

Splenda’s online marketing includes a series of YouTube videos called Splenda Essential Choices for Healthy Living, which features an ADA-certified Registered Dietitian giving people health advice—though we might call it “natural health lite”—including prominent endorsements of Splenda Essentials. Their marketing clearly targets health-conscious people interested in nutrition, while trying to pass off a toxic chemical as healthy.


Excerpt from article located at Welcome to the Alliancefor Natural Health – USA: http://www.anh-usa.org

Categories : Blog
Comments (0)

Vitamin D and fertility in men and women

Well here is another very important aspect of keeping healthy Vitamin D levels in our bloodstream. Remember, that unless you are outside with minimal clothing on without sun block for 20 minutes a day, it is virtually impossible to attain healthy levels. It’s a bit more difficult for us northeasterners to go out!! So take 4-5,000 iu day. Have your doctor run your blood chemistry and get the numbers. If you can’t, call me and I will. 50-80 ng/ml is your target!

 

Want to know more about Vitamin D and your health? Go back into my previous blogs.

 

Let the sun shine in!!

Dr. Marks

 

Vitamin D and fertility in men and women

 

Every year, billions are spent in fertility clinics; the result of which is often in vitro fertilization (IVF). About 5 years ago, I began receiving emails from a nurse practitioner in Indiana who works in a fertility clinic. Her experience was dramatic; 5,000 IU/day for both the man and woman frequently resulted in a healthy baby. However, her last email to me was quite sad, she was in danger of losing her job as her boss, a gynecologist, was losing money due to vitamin D. He ordered her to stop advocating it or lose her job.

Today, the Daily Mail and several other newspapers reviewed a lengthy article in The European Journal of Endocrinology that concluded, “Given the high prevalence of infertility as well as vitamin D insufficiency in otherwise healthy young women and men and the possible role of vitamin D in human reproduction, research might lead to new therapeutic approaches such as vitamin D supplementation in the treatment of female and male reproductive disorders.”

Critical to this carefully caged advice is the fact that men need help as frequently as the women do.  “Population-based studies found that in 30-40% of infertile couples the underlying cause is the male factor. In this context it should be mentioned that the overall semen quality of men is decreasing, which might partly be explained by environmental factors. Indeed, as much as 20% of young men have sperm concentration below the WHO recommendation level and 40% present with sperm concentrations below a level that is considered optimal for fertility.” Pretty amazing, especially when you realize these men have normal testosterone levels but that vitamin D levels are steadily decreasing.

The authors go onto say, “In northern countries, where a strong seasonal contrast in luminosity (sunshine intensity) exists, the conception rate is decreased during the dark winter months, whereas a peak in conception rate during summer leading to a maximum in birth rate in spring has been observed. Moreover, ovulation rates and endometrial receptivity seem to be reduced during long dark winters in northern countries.”

The takeaway message is the same as always, a message so common I should just start saying “ditto.” If you want to get pregnant, make sure you and your partner take 5,000 IU/day. If you don’t want to get pregnant, make sure you and your partner are on 5,000 IU/day plus a reliable method of birth control. I take no responsibility for surprise pregnancies.

 

 

 

A publication of the Vitamin D Council

Excerpt taken from article written by Dr. John Cannell

 

 

 

Comments (0)

Dr. Marks Unique Weight Management Program!!!

~Dr. Marks has designed a new and unique weight loss program~

 This program includes a meal plan, supplement protocol, 3 unique weight management products including a delicious shake, and a shaker cup!

 Give us a call or stop by to get yours now!!!

 

Comments (0)

Lower Cholesterol a Health Risk?!?

 CARDIOVASCULAR  DISEASE  ASSESSMENT

Everyone is trying to lower cholesterol, but how low is too low, and when does this cause serious problems?

The following report, should give us caution when considering cardiovascular risk reduction.

Remember, primum non nocere!  First not to harm.

A new diagnostic laboratory test known as oxidized LDL, is the most cutting edge risk factor available for cardiovascular disease assessment.

It’s not just the the HDL (good cholesterol) or LDL (bad cholesterol) that counts.

If the LDL is oxidized, it is more atherogenic, meaning disease producing to your blood vessels.

We have paired with Shiel laboratories to provide this special test and all of your standard lab needs, to bring you the best of science and nature.

Happy holidays to you and your loved ones.

May happiness, health, joy and peace be with you.

Dr. Marks

 

New Study Finds that Low Cholesterol in Elderly Doubles Risk of Early Death

Study finds that elderly with cholesterol less that 189 had a double risk of dying.

Physicians were informed to consider very low levels of cholesterol as potential warning signs of a serious disease or as signals of rapidly declining health.

The study included 4520 men and women between the ages of 65-84.

The study concluded that low total cholesterol was associated with a higher risk of death.

Low cholesterol level is a robust predictor of mortality in the nondemented elderly and may be a surrogate of frailty or subclinical disease according to the research team.

References:
Brescianini S, Maggi S, Farchi G, Mariotti S, Di Carlo A, Baldereschi M, Inzitari D; ILSA Group. Low total cholesterol and increased risk of dying: are low levels clinical warning signs in the elderly? Results from the Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jul;51(7):991-6.

Schupf N, Costa R, Luchsinger J, Tang MX, Lee JH, Mayeux R. Relationship between plasma lipids and all-cause mortality in nondemented elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Feb;53(2):219-26.

Before prescribing treatment, FMU recommends that you follow the standard of care of your profession, as well as confirm the information contained herein with other sources.

Functional medicine embraces the totality of the regulatory functions of the body. It encompasses all of the biophysical, biochemical, enzymatic, endocrine, immunological, and bioenergetic regulatory capacities.

Dr. Ron Grisanti, D.C., D.A.C.B.O., M.S., D.A.C.B.N.
Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (0)

It’s no secret that cell phones emit electromagnetic radiation, but is it harmful? The Centerof Disease Controlsays there’s no proof of harm. But the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer calls the radiation “possibly carcinogenic to humans,” and recent research,  including an ominous 2009 Journal of Clinical Oncology study, have drawn similar conclusions.

 

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (0)

Cholesterol and Co Q10, what’s the link?

 

Cholesterol and Co Q10, what’s the link?

 

It is clinically documented that statin medications (Lipitor, Crestor, Zocor, etc.) lower the essential nutrient, Co-Enzyme Q10. 

 

An estimated 11-19 million Americans as of 2007 take statin drugs. It is very important to understand that despite the need to lower cardiovascular risk, there are inherent problems associated with taking these drugs. In addition, beta blockers used for high blood pressure and many other medications cause depletion of Co Q10. The older a person is the more difficult it is to generate energy, in case you haven’t noticed that older people don’t move as fast as younger ones!! The energy generated from your cells comes from your mitochondria, and this is effected by the statin drugs. It is known as the electron transport train, which helps generate the energy you need, but the heart is extremely dependent upon CoQ10 levels. The bottom line is if you must take a statin drug, take CoQ10 along with it.

 

It is not contraindicated together as this pharmaceutical patent proves, and just might save a life or improve the quality of your life.

 

Co-Enzyme Q10 is an important co-factor in the production of energy and particularly important in muscle function.

 

Clinical studies show decreasing levels of Co-Enzyme Q10 lead to increasing severity of cardiovascular symptoms.

 

Now here is the shocker! The pharmaceutical company, Merck, was issued a patent (#4,933,165) on a special medication combining a statin medication and Co-Enzyme Q10. The researchers knew back in the late 80s and early 90s the significance of adding Co-Enzyme Q10 to statins. Furthermore they knew very well the negative impact of taking statins without supplementing with Co-Enzyme Q10. The sad news is this special combination medication was never made available to the public. It was basically put on the shelf and forgotten.

 

To read the entire story, download the patent and see what has been hidden from the public for over 20 years.

 

DOWNLOAD CoQ10-Statin Patent
Courtesy of Functional Medicine University
Categories : Blog
Comments (0)

Scoliosis and Chiropractic Care

Scoliosis and Chiropractic Care

The average reduction of thoraco-lumbar scoliosis was 17.2° and was maintained for 24 months.

Function improved 70% and pain was reduced by 60%.

According to the Mayo Clinic (2009), ” Scoliosis is a sideways curvature of the spine that occurs most often during the growth spurt just before puberty. While scoliosis can be caused by conditions such as cerebral palsy and muscular dystrophy, the cause of most scoliosis is unknown. Most cases of scoliosis are mild, but severe scoliosis can be disabling. An especially severe spinal curve can reduce the amount of space within the chest, making it difficult for the lungs to function properly. Children who have mild scoliosis are monitored closely, usually with X-rays, to see if the curve is getting worse. In many cases, no treatment is necessary. Some children will need to wear a brace to stop the curve from worsening. Others may need surgery to straighten severe cases of scoliosis” (http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/scoliosis/DS00194). They go on to say that signs and symptoms of scoliosis may include, uneven shoulders, ”Signs and symptoms of scoliosis may include: uneven shoulders, one shoulder blade that appears more prominent than the other, uneven waist, [and] one hip higher than the other” (Mayo Clinic Staff, 2009, http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/scoliosis/DS00194/ DSECTION=symptoms).

 

“If a scoliosis curve gets worse, the spine will also rotate or twist, in addition to curving side to side. This causes the ribs on one side of the body to stick out farther than on the other side. Severe scoliosis can cause back pain and difficulty breathing. Go to your doctor if you notice signs or symptoms of scoliosis in your child. Mild curves can develop without the parent or child knowing it because they appear gradually and usually don’t cause pain” (Mayo Clinic Staff, 2009,http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/ scoliosis/DS00194/ DSECTION=symptoms).

 

According to Lou et al. in 2010, three-dimensional lateral curvatures of the spine affect 2-3% of the adolescent population. According to ACT Youth who utilizes the 2000 US Census Bureau statistics, the number of adolescents in the United States is 41,747, 962. Averaging 2.5% of all adolescents having scoliosis equates to 1,043, 699 children facing issues as result of scoliosis. Lou et al. (2010) continue, “Brace (orthotic) treatment is recommended for growing children with curves of 25–45° Cobb angle. Surgery is the final treatment option for curves greater than 45° and its goals are to obtain safe correction, to produce a solid spinal fusion of the curve region, and to bring the spine and body into a more balanced position (p. 292). However, they conclude, “ Although brace treatment for scoliosis has been used for more than fifty years, its effectiveness is still debatable… Most studies used the amount of curve progression (as measured by the Cobb angle) to determine the effectiveness of brace treatment. Some defined success as 5° or less curve progression” (Lou et al., 2010, p. 292).

 

While allopathic medicine is still entrenched in the debatable practice of bracing and eventually surgery with the eventual progression of scoliosis, there are proven solutions. Morningstar concluded in 2011 that as a result of chiropractic spinal adjusting and chiropractic spinal manipulation, a thoracolumbar curvature (scoliosis) averaged a 17.2° reduction that was maintained for 24 months, the length of the study. Across all spinal groups, an average of 10° reduction was realized that persisted for 24 months, again the length of the study. Morningstar also concluded that pain scales reduced by 60% at 24 months and function improved by 70% while respiratory capacity increased 7%. Although this was a limited study with 28 patients, it is the first scientific conclusion that documents and reflects the results of what chiropractors have been realizing in their offices for over a 100 years.

 

The real issue is that if adolescents have their curvatures reduced by 10°-17.2°, then bracing and surgery are not an option because they will not be indicated. As bracing has been deemed “highly questionable” in the literature and now the literature reflects chiropractic as a highly effective modality, the standard of care across professions should be chiropractic care for scoliosis as first line treatment and should be standardized in every discipline.

 

Written by: Mark Studin DC, FASBE(C), DAAPM, DAAMLP

Reference:

Lou, E., Hill, D., Hedden, D., Mahood, J., Moreau, M., Raso, J., (2010). An objective measurement of brace usage for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Medical Engineering and Physics, 33(3), 290-294.

Morningstar, M. (2011). Outcomes for adult scoliosis patients receiving chiropractic rehabilitation: A 24-month retrospective analysis. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 10(3), 179-184.

Comments (2)

Children of the Corn (Syrup)

Children of the Corn (Syrup)

High school kids who drink more than 5 cans of soft drinks per week are 15% more likely than their non-soda’d counterparts to act violently, according to a new study from Harvard School of Public Health.

Researchers surveyed 1,878 inner-cityBostonpublic school kids, and found an unequivocal correlation between self-reported soft-drinking and aggression. Among those who drank 14 cans/week—that’s roughly one third of the kids—58% had histories of violence toward peers, and an alarming 43% carried guns or knives. For those who drank 1 or less, the numbers were 35% and 23%—still disturbingly high, when you think about it.

 

“Dose-Dependent” Relationship

 

Investigator David Hemenway says the correlation between soft drinks and violence was “dose dependent,” and similar in magnitude to correlations between teen alcohol use and violence. The data were published earlier this week in the online edition of the British journal, Injury Prevention.

Is it the sugar (corn syrup) or the caffeine? Dr. Hemenway said nobody really knows. He stressed that correlation does not prove causation, though it does raise suspicion.

 

It also raises the specter of the “Twinkie Defense”—a weird judicial episode in which a killer pleaded—somewhat successfully–that his murderous behavior was triggered by junk food. HPC wonders whether it’ll also give the gun lobby some new ammo: “Guns don’t kill people, Soft Drinks do!” Whether or not soda makes kids go ballistic, it’ll probably help make ‘em fat and sick.Princetonresearchers showed that high-fructose corn syrup—the stuff Corn Refiners Association now wants us to call “corn sugar”—is significantly more metabolically detrimental than plain white sugar. Rats that free-fed on HFCS—a top ingredient in most non-diet sodas and many junk foods—showed a 48% greater weight gain, higher abdominal fat deposition and higher triglycerides than rats free-fed plain sugar water. These effects were independent of overall caloric intake.

 

“Some people have claimed that HFCS is no different than other sweeteners when it comes to weight gain and obesity, but our results make it clear that this just isn’t true,” says neuroscientist Dr. Bart Hoebel, who specializes in appetite, weight and sugar addiction. “When rats are drinking high-fructose corn syrup at levels well below those in soda pop, they’re becoming obese — every single one. Even when rats are fed a high-fat diet, you don’t see this.” The study was published in the journal, Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior.

 

Cane vs. Corn

 

Predictably, the Corn Refiners Association decried the Hoebel study, claiming “gross errors” in the methodology. In a press release, CRA claims thePrinceton investigators “failed to put into perspective the excessive amount (of HFCS) consumed by the rats,” amounts they estimate would translate to roughly 3,000 kcal per day in human terms.

 

The issue has huge economic implications: HFCS is an ingredient in an estimated 40% of all prepared foods and beverages consumed in theUS, and the average American consumes nearly 38 pounds of the stuff every year, according to the USDA’s Economic Research Service. HFCS production requires millions of tons of domestically grown corn, which has bee federally subsidized to the tune of $40 billion since the mid 1990s.

 

The sweetener has been implicated as a major contributor to the diabetes and obesity epidemics by numerous studies. While none of these studies is definitive, the repeated bad press prompted corn refiners to seek a new image, hence the effort to rename HFCS as “corn sugar.”

 

Earlier in October, Federal District Judge Consuelo Marshall (Central California) ruled in support of a lawsuit brought by US cane sugar farmers against the corn refiners. The suit contends that CRA’s $50 million “Sweet Surprise” ad campaign, with it’s claim of equivalence between HFCS and plain sugar, constitutes false advertising. An FDA ruling on whether food manufacturers can legally call HFCS “corn sugar” is pending.

 

 Source: Holistic Primary Care

written by: Erik Goldman

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (0)

 

More Evidence Confirms Diets are Linked to Mental Health

                      In a new and burgeoning area of research, 2 new studies from Australian investigators show that diet quality can have a significant effect on mental health outcomes and may potentially have a role in preventing and treating such common illnesses as depression and anxiety. In their latest study, published online September 21 in PLoS One, principal investigator Felice Jacka, PhD, and colleagues from Deakin University and the University of Melbourne in Australia found that better diet quality was associated with better mental health in adolescents cross-sectionally and over time.

Importantly, said Dr. Jacka, these findings suggest it may be possible to prevent teenage depression by ensuring adolescent diets are sufficiently nutritious, and improving diet quality may help treat depressive symptoms in this population. She noted that three quarters of lifetime psychiatric disorders emerge in adolescence or early adulthood, and that a recent national survey showed more than 22% of adolescents aged 13 to 18 years had already experienced a clinically significant mental health problem.                                                                                              

         “In this study we show that a good-quality diet at baseline predicts better mental health at follow-up, even after adjustments for diet quality at follow-up, sociodemographic variables, exercise, and most importantly, mental health at baseline,” Dr. Jacka told Medscape Medical News. In addition, changes in diet quality over the course of 2 years were matched by changes in mental health during the same time, so children whose diets got worse had a worsening in their mental health, and those whose diet improved had improved mental health. “This was independent of every variable I could think to adjust for,” she added.

Better Nutrition, Better Mental Health                                                               

             The longitudinal, prospective study included 2054 Australian adolescents aged 11 to 18 years at baseline who were participants in a project known as It’s Your Move, aimed to increase the capacity of schools to promote healthy eating and physical activity. Study participants were sampled in 2005 to 2006, and again in 2007 to 2008. Students completed an 84-question survey designed to provide information on key behaviors such as nutrition, mental health and well-being, physical activity, and perceptions of home and school environment. Trained researchers measured students’ height and weight.

               The investigators used a healthy diet score that was based on one previously developed and validated in adults to assess participants’ diet quality and correlated it with the emotional functioning subscale of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, an assessment measure for children’s mental health.A healthy diet was defined as one that included fruit and vegetables as “core food groups” and included both 2 or more servings of fruit per day and 4 or more servings of vegetables, as well as general avoidance of processed foods including chips, fried foods, chocolate, sweets, and ice cream. An unhealthy diet was high in snack and processed foods. The investigators found that higher healthy diet scores at baseline predicted higher (better) Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory scores at follow-up, whereas higher “unhealthy” baseline scores predicted poorer mental health. The investigators also found during the 2-year study period, adolescents who improved the quality of their diets also experienced improved mental health. In contrast, those whose dietary quality deteriorated experience a worsening of their mental health status.

     

More Processed Foods, Greater Anxiety

        These latest findings come directly on the heels of another recent study by the same team of investigators that also examined the effect of diet and mental health. Published in the July issue of Psychosomatic Medicine, this earlier study revealed a significant link between better-quality diets and improved mental health outcomes, and specifically depression and anxiety, in a cohort of Norwegian adult men and women.                                                                                              

           “The dietary data we had in this study were very good, and we were able to see there were clear dietary patterns: a healthy pattern, an unhealthy pattern, and a ‘traditional’ dietary pattern that is indicative of the culture. In this case we had a distinct Norwegian traditional dietary pattern,” said Dr. Jacka. The investigators constructed an a priori dietary score so that all participants received a value, and then compared that score against mental health outcomes, using the hospital anxiety and depression scale.”We found individuals with better quality diets were less likely to be depressed, whereas a higher intake of processed and unhealthy foods was associated with increased anxiety,” the researchers write.

The findings from both articles mirror results of a previous study from 2010, conducted by Dr. Jacka and colleagues and reported by Medscape Medical News at that time, which examined diet and mental health outcomes in a cohort of Australian women across a wide range of ages. Similar to the other 2 more recent papers, the findings from this large, cross-sectional study showed that women who regularly consumed a “whole” diet consisting of vegetables, fruit, whole grains, and high-quality meat and fish cut their risk for major depression, dysthmia, and anxiety disorders by more than 30%. In comparison, their counterparts who consumed a so-called Western diet, which was high in refined or processed foods and saturated fats, had a 50% increased likelihood of depression.

Diverse Populations, Highly Consistent Data

Although all of these studies have been conducted in different populations, the findings are “remarkably similar,” said Dr. Jacka. “These observational data, including effect sizes, are highly consistent, which is unusual in a new area of study in psychiatry, or any other area of medicine for that matter. We’ve seen this right across the world: inAustralia, theUnited Kingdom,Japan,Spain, theUnited States, and now inNorway. We are seeing it in adolescents as well as adults; in males as well as females. It is very consistent.” Although the underlying mechanisms are not clear, there are several hypotheses.

               “We know that diet quality has a real impact on your immune system and oxidative stress. It affects gene expression, and it has a potent impact on the neurotrophic factors, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor, which we know are particularly relevant in psychiatric illness. We think it is plausible that through dietary change we can modulate these biologic factors and, over time, modulate the risk for depression and anxiety,” she said. With five papers on diet quality and mental health published since early 2010, Dr. Jacka and colleagues are arguably the world’s leaders in this new research area. However, there have been other recent noteworthy studies supporting a link between diet and mental health. For instance, another study published earlier this year in PLoS ONE and reported by Medscape Medical News showed that consumption of trans fats was linked to a significant increased risk for depression, whereas monounsaturated fatty acids and polyunsaturated fatty acids lowered depression risk.

New Approach to Mental Illness?

This growing body of evidence, said Dr. Jacka, hints at the possibility of an exciting new approach to preventing and treating common mental illnesses, including depression and anxiety. At this time, only about 30% of patients with depression respond to antidepressant medication, and a similar proportion respond to psychotherapy, said Dr. Jacka. “Given that the majority of mental health problems start before age 25, and the enormous burden of illness of depression and anxiety in young people, and given that nutrition is so critical to adequate development, we think these data have enormous significant implications for public health,” she said.

However, before physicians can feel confident about treating common mental illnesses with diet, an “enormous research gap” needs to be filled. “We need pivotal randomized controlled intervention trials to answer the question ‘If I improve my diet, will my mental health — particularly depression — improve?’ “During the past year, there also have been a couple of intervention studies suggesting that long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids may be beneficial in preventing psychosis and treating anxiety.

Most notably, results of a 2010 randomized placebo controlled trial conducted by Paul Amminger, MD, from the Oxygen Research Centre in Melbourne, Australia, and reported by Medscape Medical News, showed that fish oil supplements prevented conversion from a sub threshold psychotic state to full-blown schizophrenia. Another recent randomized controlled trial study by investigators at the Ohio State University College of Medicine inColumbus suggested that omega-3 supplements might help reduce anxiety.

Are You What Your Mother Ate?

Dr. Jacka noted that her team has applied for funding to conduct a randomized controlled trial of diet and mental health outcomes. “So far we know exercise is a very effective treatment strategy for depression, but we have yet to determine whether dietary improvement is an effective treatment strategy,” she said. However, she added, even in the absence of intervention studies, it is not too soon for physicians to raise the issue of diet with patients suffering from anxiety and depression.

“We already know that a good diet and exercise are critical in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease and obesity, both of which are extremely common in people with mental illness. Therefore, for these reasons alone, diet and exercise should be at the top of the list of things physicians discuss with their patients. “Also, based on this very consistent literature that has emerged over the last 18 months, I think we are pretty safe in saying diet is important in mental health. The only thing we do not know for sure is whether diet can improve mental health outcomes. But certainly, based on what we know from epidemiological evidence, I’d be quite confident in recommending physicians address lifestyle in patients with depression and anxiety,” she said.

Dr. Jacka also plans to study prenatal nutrition and early childhood diet as they relate to mental health outcomes in offspring.”I’d like to think that in the not-too-distant future we may be able to say whether or not the diet that a mother eats when she is pregnant and the diet children eat in those first few years has an influence on whether a child will go on to develop depression and anxiety in their teens,” she said.

In addition, the investigators hope to receive funding to examine biomarker data in the cohort of Australian women to determine whether diet influences biological markers of depression including oxidative stress, proinflammatory cytokines, and peripherally circulating brain derived neurotrophic factor, and whether these findings correlate with mental health outcomes. ‘We hope to continue to develop this evidence base and work towards a public health message on primary prevention of depression and anxiety,” she said.

Dr. Jacka and colleagues have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

PLosOne. Published online September 21, 2011. Abstract

Psychosomatic Med. 2011;73:483-490. Abstract

Research written and performed by Dr. Felice Jacka

Categories : Blog, Uncategorized
Comments (0)

 Go For Depth

“Mastery does not come from dabbling. We have to be prepared to pay the price. We need to have the sustained enthusiasm that motivates us to give our best.” – Eknath Easwaran

Our world now offers us a smorgasbord of opportunities. In the personal growth field alone, there is a myriad of books and products, all promising relief from what ails us. It is easy to flip quickly from one program to another when something new captures our imagination.                                                            If I long for change in my life, however, I need to do more than skim the surface. I need to make time and take time to both learn new approaches and then — most importantly — to apply what I have learned. If I jump around to new techniques too rapidly, I will not benefit from any of them.

 ”Genius is only the power of making continuous efforts.”– Elbert Hubbard

 For more information or to see the Integrative Assessment Technique firsthand, please visit:

www.facebook.com/docmarks

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMK1wDhJVmY                            

         

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (0)