Layout Image

 

More Evidence Confirms Diets are Linked to Mental Health

                      In a new and burgeoning area of research, 2 new studies from Australian investigators show that diet quality can have a significant effect on mental health outcomes and may potentially have a role in preventing and treating such common illnesses as depression and anxiety. In their latest study, published online September 21 in PLoS One, principal investigator Felice Jacka, PhD, and colleagues from Deakin University and the University of Melbourne in Australia found that better diet quality was associated with better mental health in adolescents cross-sectionally and over time.

Importantly, said Dr. Jacka, these findings suggest it may be possible to prevent teenage depression by ensuring adolescent diets are sufficiently nutritious, and improving diet quality may help treat depressive symptoms in this population. She noted that three quarters of lifetime psychiatric disorders emerge in adolescence or early adulthood, and that a recent national survey showed more than 22% of adolescents aged 13 to 18 years had already experienced a clinically significant mental health problem.                                                                                              

         “In this study we show that a good-quality diet at baseline predicts better mental health at follow-up, even after adjustments for diet quality at follow-up, sociodemographic variables, exercise, and most importantly, mental health at baseline,” Dr. Jacka told Medscape Medical News. In addition, changes in diet quality over the course of 2 years were matched by changes in mental health during the same time, so children whose diets got worse had a worsening in their mental health, and those whose diet improved had improved mental health. “This was independent of every variable I could think to adjust for,” she added.

Better Nutrition, Better Mental Health                                                               

             The longitudinal, prospective study included 2054 Australian adolescents aged 11 to 18 years at baseline who were participants in a project known as It’s Your Move, aimed to increase the capacity of schools to promote healthy eating and physical activity. Study participants were sampled in 2005 to 2006, and again in 2007 to 2008. Students completed an 84-question survey designed to provide information on key behaviors such as nutrition, mental health and well-being, physical activity, and perceptions of home and school environment. Trained researchers measured students’ height and weight.

               The investigators used a healthy diet score that was based on one previously developed and validated in adults to assess participants’ diet quality and correlated it with the emotional functioning subscale of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, an assessment measure for children’s mental health.A healthy diet was defined as one that included fruit and vegetables as “core food groups” and included both 2 or more servings of fruit per day and 4 or more servings of vegetables, as well as general avoidance of processed foods including chips, fried foods, chocolate, sweets, and ice cream. An unhealthy diet was high in snack and processed foods. The investigators found that higher healthy diet scores at baseline predicted higher (better) Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory scores at follow-up, whereas higher “unhealthy” baseline scores predicted poorer mental health. The investigators also found during the 2-year study period, adolescents who improved the quality of their diets also experienced improved mental health. In contrast, those whose dietary quality deteriorated experience a worsening of their mental health status.

     

More Processed Foods, Greater Anxiety

        These latest findings come directly on the heels of another recent study by the same team of investigators that also examined the effect of diet and mental health. Published in the July issue of Psychosomatic Medicine, this earlier study revealed a significant link between better-quality diets and improved mental health outcomes, and specifically depression and anxiety, in a cohort of Norwegian adult men and women.                                                                                              

           “The dietary data we had in this study were very good, and we were able to see there were clear dietary patterns: a healthy pattern, an unhealthy pattern, and a ‘traditional’ dietary pattern that is indicative of the culture. In this case we had a distinct Norwegian traditional dietary pattern,” said Dr. Jacka. The investigators constructed an a priori dietary score so that all participants received a value, and then compared that score against mental health outcomes, using the hospital anxiety and depression scale.”We found individuals with better quality diets were less likely to be depressed, whereas a higher intake of processed and unhealthy foods was associated with increased anxiety,” the researchers write.

The findings from both articles mirror results of a previous study from 2010, conducted by Dr. Jacka and colleagues and reported by Medscape Medical News at that time, which examined diet and mental health outcomes in a cohort of Australian women across a wide range of ages. Similar to the other 2 more recent papers, the findings from this large, cross-sectional study showed that women who regularly consumed a “whole” diet consisting of vegetables, fruit, whole grains, and high-quality meat and fish cut their risk for major depression, dysthmia, and anxiety disorders by more than 30%. In comparison, their counterparts who consumed a so-called Western diet, which was high in refined or processed foods and saturated fats, had a 50% increased likelihood of depression.

Diverse Populations, Highly Consistent Data

Although all of these studies have been conducted in different populations, the findings are “remarkably similar,” said Dr. Jacka. “These observational data, including effect sizes, are highly consistent, which is unusual in a new area of study in psychiatry, or any other area of medicine for that matter. We’ve seen this right across the world: inAustralia, theUnited Kingdom,Japan,Spain, theUnited States, and now inNorway. We are seeing it in adolescents as well as adults; in males as well as females. It is very consistent.” Although the underlying mechanisms are not clear, there are several hypotheses.

               “We know that diet quality has a real impact on your immune system and oxidative stress. It affects gene expression, and it has a potent impact on the neurotrophic factors, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor, which we know are particularly relevant in psychiatric illness. We think it is plausible that through dietary change we can modulate these biologic factors and, over time, modulate the risk for depression and anxiety,” she said. With five papers on diet quality and mental health published since early 2010, Dr. Jacka and colleagues are arguably the world’s leaders in this new research area. However, there have been other recent noteworthy studies supporting a link between diet and mental health. For instance, another study published earlier this year in PLoS ONE and reported by Medscape Medical News showed that consumption of trans fats was linked to a significant increased risk for depression, whereas monounsaturated fatty acids and polyunsaturated fatty acids lowered depression risk.

New Approach to Mental Illness?

This growing body of evidence, said Dr. Jacka, hints at the possibility of an exciting new approach to preventing and treating common mental illnesses, including depression and anxiety. At this time, only about 30% of patients with depression respond to antidepressant medication, and a similar proportion respond to psychotherapy, said Dr. Jacka. “Given that the majority of mental health problems start before age 25, and the enormous burden of illness of depression and anxiety in young people, and given that nutrition is so critical to adequate development, we think these data have enormous significant implications for public health,” she said.

However, before physicians can feel confident about treating common mental illnesses with diet, an “enormous research gap” needs to be filled. “We need pivotal randomized controlled intervention trials to answer the question ‘If I improve my diet, will my mental health — particularly depression — improve?’ “During the past year, there also have been a couple of intervention studies suggesting that long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids may be beneficial in preventing psychosis and treating anxiety.

Most notably, results of a 2010 randomized placebo controlled trial conducted by Paul Amminger, MD, from the Oxygen Research Centre in Melbourne, Australia, and reported by Medscape Medical News, showed that fish oil supplements prevented conversion from a sub threshold psychotic state to full-blown schizophrenia. Another recent randomized controlled trial study by investigators at the Ohio State University College of Medicine inColumbus suggested that omega-3 supplements might help reduce anxiety.

Are You What Your Mother Ate?

Dr. Jacka noted that her team has applied for funding to conduct a randomized controlled trial of diet and mental health outcomes. “So far we know exercise is a very effective treatment strategy for depression, but we have yet to determine whether dietary improvement is an effective treatment strategy,” she said. However, she added, even in the absence of intervention studies, it is not too soon for physicians to raise the issue of diet with patients suffering from anxiety and depression.

“We already know that a good diet and exercise are critical in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease and obesity, both of which are extremely common in people with mental illness. Therefore, for these reasons alone, diet and exercise should be at the top of the list of things physicians discuss with their patients. “Also, based on this very consistent literature that has emerged over the last 18 months, I think we are pretty safe in saying diet is important in mental health. The only thing we do not know for sure is whether diet can improve mental health outcomes. But certainly, based on what we know from epidemiological evidence, I’d be quite confident in recommending physicians address lifestyle in patients with depression and anxiety,” she said.

Dr. Jacka also plans to study prenatal nutrition and early childhood diet as they relate to mental health outcomes in offspring.”I’d like to think that in the not-too-distant future we may be able to say whether or not the diet that a mother eats when she is pregnant and the diet children eat in those first few years has an influence on whether a child will go on to develop depression and anxiety in their teens,” she said.

In addition, the investigators hope to receive funding to examine biomarker data in the cohort of Australian women to determine whether diet influences biological markers of depression including oxidative stress, proinflammatory cytokines, and peripherally circulating brain derived neurotrophic factor, and whether these findings correlate with mental health outcomes. ‘We hope to continue to develop this evidence base and work towards a public health message on primary prevention of depression and anxiety,” she said.

Dr. Jacka and colleagues have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

PLosOne. Published online September 21, 2011. Abstract

Psychosomatic Med. 2011;73:483-490. Abstract

Research written and performed by Dr. Felice Jacka

Categories : Blog, Uncategorized
Comments (0)

 Go For Depth

“Mastery does not come from dabbling. We have to be prepared to pay the price. We need to have the sustained enthusiasm that motivates us to give our best.” – Eknath Easwaran

Our world now offers us a smorgasbord of opportunities. In the personal growth field alone, there is a myriad of books and products, all promising relief from what ails us. It is easy to flip quickly from one program to another when something new captures our imagination.                                                            If I long for change in my life, however, I need to do more than skim the surface. I need to make time and take time to both learn new approaches and then — most importantly — to apply what I have learned. If I jump around to new techniques too rapidly, I will not benefit from any of them.

 ”Genius is only the power of making continuous efforts.”– Elbert Hubbard

 For more information or to see the Integrative Assessment Technique firsthand, please visit:

www.facebook.com/docmarks

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMK1wDhJVmY                            

         

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (0)

Chiropractic Outperforms Muscle Relaxers!

 
 
Low Back Pain:
Chiropractic Adjustments vs. Muscle Relaxants 
Chiropractic had a better outcome in 24% of the patients
 
Outcomes in clinical trials shed light on effectiveness in care. When there are studies that are blinded, or performed without the research patient knowing what is being done is the one of the purest forms of unbiased conclusion. This was one such study and the results confirmed what chiropractic has been saying for over 100 years: it works and with low back pain and better that muscle relaxers that have been prescribed for decades. The goal of this review is to give patients a better chance, with virtually no side effects positive outcomes for low back pain.
To learn more, click on the link below or copy and paste to your Web browser.
Click below or copy: 
 
 
This research is offered as a community service
from our office.
————————————————————————————————
Make sure that you read and are versed in the research review. Also understand that is meant for the public and written in non-medical language.
 
Respectfully,

Loren Marks, DC, DACBN

200 West 57th Street, Suite 1010
New York, NY 10019
212-333-7300
 
 
                              References:
Mark Studin DC, FASBE(C), DAAPM, DAAMLP
Academy of Chiropractic

US Chiropractic Directory
631-786-4253

 www.TeachChiros.com
 
www.TeachDoctors.com
 www.USChiroDirectory.com
Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (0)

Integrative Assessment Technique (Part 2)

Comments (0)

Comments (2)

New Study on the Role of Vitamin D in Colon Cancer

ANOTHER REASON TO MAKE SURE YOU MAINTAIN OPTIMAL VITAMIN D LEVELS

 Do you know what your vitamin D levels are in your blood?

 The laboratory analysis of vitamin D states that 0-20 is a deficiency, 20-30 is an insufficiency, and a healthy range is 30-100.  With these ranges in mind one would think Vit D levels of 31 are ok; so many physicians do not prescribe vitamin D at this level. This is unfortunate, because many studies have proven that levels below 32 do not support bone density. 

In the world of functional and alternative medicine, some doctors, of whom are the most knowledgeable doctors in the field of nutrition, believe that a value of 50-80, maintains better immunity.  This level also lowers risk to certain cancers, has a beneficial effect on auto-immune diseases, lowers inflammation levels (which are tied to more diseases than you can imagine), and also that 1/3 of your entire genome (your genetic makeup) is influenced by Vit D. 

 Many good research papers support this information, and I subscribe to this wholeheartedly. When my patients see their M.D.’s and have there blood tests performed, they are surprised to see that my patient population routinely falls in the favorable range, while most others fall significantly below, and the majority fall between deficiency and insufficiency.

 This is not a “pat on my own back” comment, but from the article below, you should be able to get just how important Vit D really is. Did you know that it is not only a vitamin but also a hormone?  When studied in a hospital setting, researchers found that elderly patients who had the lowest Vit D levels suffered from all cause mortality.  I run these levels in my blood testing profiles as a routine part of my assessment. DO NOT THINK THAT YOUR SUN EXPOSURE has your values in optimal ranges without blood testing! Sun block, age, obesity, race, malabsorption and other factors influence your Vit D levels. The 400iu doses of Vit D are passe and so is the new 600iu recommendation from the National Institute of Medicine in my humble opinion. The blood values tell the truth, 4-600iu don’t get you where you want to be, and certainly wont get you to the sweet spot!

 I welcome your comments, and hope you find this information valuable to improve the quality of your life, and those you love. Pass it on.

Dr. Marks

Loren Marks D.C., DACBN
Diplomate American Clinical Board of Nutrition
Integrative Assessment Technique, Founder
200 W 57 St. Ste 1010 NY, NY, 10019
212-333-7300

 

New Study on the Role of Vitamin D in Colon Cancer
8/17/11Professor Hector Palmer and his co-researchers at the Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology in Barcelona, Spain, announced this morning the reason vitamin D may be an effective treatment early in the course of colon cancer, yet have little effect later as the cancer becomes more widely spread.

Larriba MJ, Ordóñez-Morán P, Chicote I, Martín-Fernández G, Puig I, et al. 2011 Vitamin D Receptor Deficiency Enhances Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling and Tumor Burden in Colon Cancer. PLoS ONE 6(8): e23524. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023524

Vitamin D, in the form of the vitamin D receptor, slows the action of a key carcinogenic protein, beta-catenin. The problem arises when the tumor start to grow and, like in many cancers, reduces the presence of VDR, and finally there is simply not enough VDR to counteract the beta-catenin. And then the tumor takes over.

However, what I really like is Professor Palmer’s statement about what vitamin D can be expected to do. He says, “In light of these findings, chronic vitamin D deficiency represents a risk factor in the development of more aggressive colon tumors.” I also like United Press International’s summary of the study: “Patients in the initial stages of colon cancer, when the vitamin D receptor still has a substantial presence in the cells, could benefit from vitamin D3, but this would not be useful in the advanced stages when the presence of the vitamin D receptor is very much reduced.”

Vitamin D receptor slows colon tumors

That is pretty much what we see in studies of patients with colon cancer. High vitamin D levels appear to slow the growth of colon cancer only in some people, and we now can suspect those people are mainly patients with early stages of colon cancer and healthy numbers of VDRs.

It is a common and sad story. One of the first things most cancers do, early in their growth, is ramp-down the machinery that increases vitamin D production in the cell and ramp-up production of the machinery that gets rid of vitamin D in the cell.

What we hope (and some think it’s more than just hope) is that maintaining physiological vitamin D levels for years and years before you get cancer will ward off the disease. Although some studies support that, not all do, and only time will tell if our hope is grounded in reality.

-John J. Cannell

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (0)

Baths For Purification!!!

        

            BATHS FOR PURIFICATION

You may experience flu-like symptoms, have excessive dry skin, or are overall too acid (key question “Do you wake up achy all over and feel better immediately after a shower?  If the answer is “yes,” you are too acid), or if you want to detoxify, or have been exposed to X-rays either from airport scanners, X-ray exams or cancer treatments, you would benefit from one of these baths. 

                                                      EPSON SALT and GINGER

This bath opens pores, eliminates toxins and also helps to eliminate pain.  One cup of Epsom salt to 2 tablespoons of ginger stirred in a cup of water first, and then add to the bath.  Do not remain in the bath for more than 30 minutes. 

                                                            VINEGARBATH

This is a quick way of restoring the acid-alkaline balance.  Use one cup to 2 quarts of unpasteurized apple cider vinegar to a bathtub of warm water.  Soak 40 to 45 minutes.  This is excellent for excess uric acid in the body and is especially helpful for the joints, and for conditions such as arthritic, bursitis, tendonitis and gout. 

                                                           BENTONITEBATH

This is a very fast detoxification method.  Soak 2 to 4 pounds of bentonite clay in a flat container overnight to dissolve it.  Then add to the tub of water.  With 2 pounds of bentonite, you would soak one hour.  With 4 pounds, you would soak 30 minutes.  The more bentonite used, the faster the detoxification. 

                                         EPSON SALT, SEA SALT and OILBATH

This is a very helpful bath for dry skin and stress.  Take one cup of Epson salt, and cup of sea salt, and one cup of sesame oil and put in a warm tub of water.  Soak for 20 minutes.  Pat yourself dry.

                                                  SALT and SODABATH

This bath counteracts the effects of radiation from X-rays, radiation therapy, etc.  Add one cup of baking soda to one to two cups of sea salt or Epsom salt, to a tub of warm water and soak for at least 20 minutes.

 With all of these baths, emphasize warm water and not scalding hot water.  You can always add hot water to the tub if the water gets chilly.  (Too hot of water may cause you to pass out when you stand up.)  Then pat dry (don’t rub) as this will enhance the benefit of the soaking. 

-Reprinted from an excerpt by Donald F. Feeney DC, DACBN, CCN, LD/N.

 

 

 

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (0)

Chiropractic Vs. Medication

Headaches & Migraines:
Chiropractic vs. Medication; Effectiveness & Safety

 

In randomized clinical trials, chiropractic was 57% more effective in the reduction of headaches and migraines than drug therapy…….

              It was reported in October of 2010 by Wrong Diagnosis that approximately 1 in 6,16.54% or 45 million Americans get headaches yearly, with many people suffering daily. While the statistical numbers vary based upon your source of information, it can be agreed upon that headaches are very common and shared among Americans at an epidemic rate. Taking into account that a single pill for many Americans to treat a headache can cost as much as $43, according to Consumer Reports Health Best Buy Drugs, the overall cost to our economy totals billions of dollars and we need to focus not on the treatment of the effects, but the root of the cause.

             When you suffer from headaches, it affects every facet of your life and you search for immediate answers. Most often it is a medication, either over-the-counter or prescription as evidenced by the amount of money spent as previously reported. One of the first medications recognized for the potential treatment of headaches is amatriptyline, commonly known by brand names such as Elavil, Endep or Amitrol as reported by Robert on About.com in 2006. It is also used as an antidepressant. This medication has made up a large part of the billion dollar industry along with over-the counter-medications. Although in many instances, this drug is indicated, the question that arises is what are the risks of taking this widely used medication?

          The potential side effects of this medication targeted for headache sufferers, according to drugs.com (n.d.), are: blurred vision, change in sexual desire or ability, constipation, diarrhea, dizziness, drowsiness; dry mouth, headache, loss of appetite, nausea, tiredness, trouble sleeping, and weakness. Severe allergic reactions can be: rash, hives, itching, difficulty breathing, tightness in the chest, swelling of the mouth, face, lips, or tongue, chest pain, confusion, dark urine, delusions, difficulty speaking or swallowing, fainting, fast or irregular heartbeat, fever, chills, or sore throat; hallucinations, new or worsening agitation, anxiety, panic attacks, aggressiveness, impulsiveness, irritability, hostility, exaggerated feeling of well-being, restlessness, or inability to sit still, numbness or tingling in an arm or leg, one-sided weakness, seizures, severe or persistent dizziness or headache, severe or persistent trouble sleeping, slurred speech, suicidal thoughts or actions, tremor, trouble urinating, uncontrolled muscle movements (such as in the face, tongue, arms or legs), unusual bleeding or bruising, unusual or severe mental or mood changes, vision problems, and yellowing of the skin or eyes. Over the counter remedies of NSAID’s or aspirin have a long list of their own of side effects.

          The safety of chiropractic, in spite of rhetoric from naysayers, has been documented in clinical trials by Miller and Benfield (2008), who reported on children younger under 3 years old, “the youngest and most vulnerable population…” (p. 420). There was one reaction reports for every 749 adjustments which was typically crying. None were reported to have any serious side effects.

          In adults, clinically, the majority of any side effects are soreness that is transient. This is based upon this author’s 30 years of clinical experience and teaching doctors of chiropractic who are trained in creating an accurate diagnosis, prognosis and treatment plan. To say that more serious side effects cannot happen is irresponsible. However, they are rare, non-life threatening and usually transient in nature, no different than infants. To ensure the best outcomes, like with any professional, you have to verify the doctor’s credentials and experience, which is best accomplished by securing a copy of the doctor’s curriculum vitae (his/her academic and professional credentials).

          Nelson et. al. (1998) reported on randomized clinical trials that took place over an 8-week course. The results showed there was minor statistical differences in outcomes for improvement during the trial period for chiropractic care, amatriptyline and over-the-counter medications for treating migraine headaches. It was also reported that there was no statistical benefit in combining therapies. However, the major factor is that in the post-treatment follow-up period, chiropractic was 57% more effective in the reduction of headaches than drug therapy.

          Bryans, et. al. (2011) confirmed Nelson’s findings and reported that spinal manipulation (adjusting) is recommended for patients with episodic or chronic migraines with or without aura and patients with cervicogenic headaches. This follow-up study is not a comparison or comment on the use of drugs. It simply demonstrates that chiropractic is a viable solution for many and can save the government and private industry billions in expenditures both in health care coverage, loss of productivity and avoidance of absenteeism in industry creating a new level of cost as sequella to headaches.

          Medications and other forms of invasive care are often necessary and it is critical for a trained doctor to perform an accurate history and physical and when indicated, advanced diagnostic testing (CAT scans, MRI’s, etc.) to ensure there aren’t more serious underlying complications. However, based upon the results of the research provided by Nelson et al. (1998) and Bryans et. al. (2011), it should be chiropractic first, drugs second and surgery last to render better outcomes with less potential side effects and a quicker return to productivity.

 

References:                                                                                                                                                                                                1. Wrong Diagnosis. (2010, October 6). Prevalence statistics for types of headaches and migraine conditions. Health Grades Inc. Retrieved from http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/h/headache_and_migraine_conditions/prevalence-types.htm

 2. Consumer Reports Health Best Buy Drugs. (n.d.). Treating migraine headaches: The triptans, Comparing effectiveness, safety, and price. Health.org. Retrieved fromhttp://www.consumerreports.org/health/resources/pdf/best-buy-drugs/triptanFINAL.pdf

3. Robert, T. (2006, May 26). Amitriptyline: Headache and migraine drug profiles. About.com. Retrieved fromhttp://headaches.about.com/od/medicationprofiles/a/amitriptyline.htm

4. Drugs.com. (n.d.). Amitriptyline side effects. Retrieved fromhttp://www.drugs.com/sfx/amitriptyline-side-effects.html

5. Miller, J. E., & Benfield, K. (2008). Adverse effects of spinal manipulative therapy in children younger than 3 years: A retrospective study in a chiropractic teaching clinic. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 31(6), 419-423.

6. Nelson, C. F., Bronfort, G., Evans, R., Boline, P., Goldsmith, C., & Anderson, A. V. (1998). The efficacy of spinal manipulation, amitriptyline and the combination of both therapies for the prophylaxis of migraine headache. Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics, 21(8), 511-519.

7. Bryans, R., Descarreaux, M., Duranleau, M., Marcoux, H., Potter, B., Ruegg, R.,… White, E. (2011). Evidenced-based guidelines for the treatment of adults with headache. Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics, 34(5), 274-289.

 

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (0)

Forgiveness Brings Joy!

                                                                             

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                        

                               ” The greatest evil that can befall man is that he should come to think ill of himself.”

                                                                                  — Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe

 

                                                   Do you feel worthy of having joy? Do you feel you deserve it?

The first step to activating our inner joy is to eliminate the blocks to it. We can start by truly forgiving ourselves and all others. Forgiveness calls for a shift in our perception. It is easier to forgive ourselves and others when we really understand that each of us has always done the very best we knew to do at that time.

“If we don’t forgive ourselves for our mistakes, and others for the wounds they have inflicted upon us, we end up crippled with guilt. And the soul cannot grow under a blanket of guilt, because guilt is isolating, while growth is a gradual process of reconnection to ourselves, to other people, and to a larger whole.”– Joan Borysenko

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (0)

 Chiropractors Save Federal and Private Insurers  $15,897,840,000

and  adds  $692,160,000 in Wages to Americans

 by Mark Studin DC, FASBE(C), DAAPM, DAAMLP

It was reported by Zigler in 2011 that 200,000 spinal fusion surgeries are performed each year, just in the United States alone. An equal number of microdiscectomies are performed as reported by Mayer (2006), which is considered by many to be a conservative number. Let us consider the chiropractic impact of exposing the public to treatment that could avoid needless surgeries, using the 400,000 disc surgeries as a conservative number, not to mention how this could change the unnecessary cost to government and private insurers and lost revenue to both governmental agencies and workers from absenteeism. Allen and Garfin (2010) reported that spine-related health care expenditures totalled over $97.5 billion (2011 inflation adjusted), a 65% increase from 1997. With an aging population, this trend, based on the biomechanics of the aged, will continue.

It was reported by McMorland, Suter, Casha, du Plessis, and Hurlbert in 2010 that over 250,000 patients a year undergo elective lumbar discectomy (spinal surgery) for the treatment of low back disc issues in the United States. The researchers did a comparative randomized clinical study comparing spinal microdiscectomy (surgery) performed by neurosurgeons to non-operative manipulative treatments (chiropractic adjustments) performed by chiropractors. They compared quality of life and disabilities of the patients in the study.

The study was limited to patients with distinct one-sided lumbar disc herniations as diagnosed via MRI and had associated radicular (nerve root) symptoms. Based upon the authors’ review of available MRI studies, the patients participating in the study were all initially considered surgical candidates. Both the surgical and chiropractic groups reported no new neurological problems and had only minor post-treatment soreness. 60% of the patients who underwent chiropractic care reported a successful outcome while 40% required surgery and of those 40%, all reported successful outcomes. This study concluded that 60% of the potential surgical candidates had positive outcomes utilizing chiropractic as the alternative to surgery.

Let us do the math. If we take the 400,000 disc surgeries (adding cervical surgeries to the equation) done each year as discussed in the opening paragraph and apply McMorland et al.’s (2010) findings that 60% of surgical candidates had successful outcomes with chiropractic as an alternative to surgery, 240,000 patients yearly could avoid needless surgery if they sought chiropractic care.

According to Sherman, Cauthen, Schoenberg, Burns, Reaven and Griffith in 2010, the 2010 inflation adjusted amount per case in Medicare dollars is $13,243.82 per patient once you take into consideration the complications, but exclude many other variables such as repeated MRI’s, myelograms, and many hospital charges. Allen and Garfin (2010), taking into account total charges, including mean hospital charges for a single level, uncomplicated, minimally invasive surgery, reported the cost to be $70,159 for all payors. They also went on to report that for 2-level disc surgeries the complication rate increased by 25% with significantly more costs.

If you consider 240,000 preventable surgeries at $70,159 per patient, that equates to $16,838,160,000 healthcare dollars that did not have to be spent. MEDSTAT, as reported by Chiropractic Lifecare of America (2009), estimated that the average cost of chiropractic care per patient per case is $3,918 (2011 inflation-adjusted dollars.) If you take this amount and apply it to the 240,000 unnecessary surgeries, you have a net savings of $66,241 per patient. The net savings to the Medicare system and private insurers is $15,897,840,000.

According to Fayssoux, Goldfarb, Vaccaro, James (2010) who studied the indirect costs associated with surgery for low back pain, the average lost productivity related to absenteeism resulted in lost wages of $2,884 per patient for the first postoperative year. “The findings demonstrate the significant, though not surprising, impact of spinal disability on productivity, and the importance of including measurement of lost productivity and return to work…” (Fayssoux et al., 2010, p. 9). This equals an additional $692,160,000 in wages to Americans per year by taking the necessity of absenteeism out of the equation with no surgeries to recover from.

Chiropractic offers solutions to the federal government, local government, and public and private insurance companies by avoiding unnecessary surgeries. Chiropractic offers solutions to the economy of local, state and federal governments by increasing the tax base and productivity in the marketplace because of keeping workers at work and circulating money into local economies with increased paychecks at the end of the year. The research is conclusive and chiropractic has solutions to many of the economic and societal problems in the United States and worldwide.

References:

1. Zigler, J. (2002). Lumbar artificial disc surgery for chronic back pain. spine-health. Retrieved fromhttp://www.spine-health.com/treatment/artificial-disc-replacement/lumbar-artificial-disc-surgery-chronic-back-pain

2. Allen, R. T., & Garfin, S. R. (2010). The economics of minimally invasive spine surgery: The value perspective. Spine, 35(Suppl. 26), 375-382.

3. Mayer, H. M. (Ed.). (2006). Minimally invasive spine surgery: A surgical manual. Germany: Springer.

3. McMorland, G., Suter, E., Casha, S., du Plessis, S. J., & Hurlbert, R. J. (2010). Manipulation or microdiskectomy for sciatica? A prospective randomized clinical study. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 33(8), 576-584.

4. Sherman, J., Cauthen, J., Schoenberg, D., Burns, M., Reaven, N. L., & Griffith, S. L. (2010). Economic impact of improving outcomes of lumbar discectomy. The Spine Journal, 10(2), 108–116.

5. Chiropractic Lifecare of America. (2009). The MESTAT Project. Learning. Retrieved from http://www.clahealthcare.com/learning/index.html

6. Fayssoux, R., Goldfarb, N. I., Vaccaro, A. R., & Harrop, J. (2010). Indirect costs associated with surgery for low back pain—A secondary analysis of clinical trial data. Population Health Management, 13(1), 9-13.

Categories : Uncategorized
Comments (2)